... Cinel MALITA SERBIA Dejan MARKOVIÄ - Editor Slavoljub ŽIVKOVIÄ Zoran ... H. Petanovski S. Carceva-Shalja S. Georg...
BALKAN OF
JOURNAL
STOMATOLOGY
Official publication of the BALKAN STOMATOLOGICAL SOCIETY
Volume V olume 16
No 3
ISSN 1107 - 1141
November 2012
Y
T E I
C
BALKAN JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
ISSN 1107 - 1141
O
S
L
A
C I
G
O L
O
T A S T O M
Ljubomir TODOROVIĆ, DDS, MSc, PhD Faculty of Dentistry University of Belgrade Dr Subotića 8 11000 Belgrade
Editor-in-Chief
Serbia
Editorial board ROMANIA
ALBANIA
Ruzhdie QAFMOLLA - Editor Emil KUV KUVARA ARATI TI Besnik GA GAV VAZI
Address: Dental University Clinic Tirana, Albania
Alexandru-Andrei Alexandru-And rei ILIESCU - Editor
Address:
Victor NAMIGEAN
Faculty of Dentistry
Cinel MALITA
Calea Plevnei 19, sect. 1 70754 Bucuresti, Romania
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Maida GANIBEGOVIĆ - Editor Naida HADŽIABDIĆ Mihael STANOJEVIĆ
Address: Faculty of Dentistry Bolnička 4a
SERBIA
Dejan MARKOVIĆ - Editor Slavoljub ŽIVKOVIĆ Zoran STAJČIĆ
71000 Sarajevo, BIH BULGARIA
Nikolai POPOV POPOV - Editor Editor
Address:
Nikola ATANASSOV Nikolai SHARKOV
Faculty of Dentistry G. Sofiiski str. str. 1 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
TURKEY
FYROM
Julijana GJORGOV GJORGOVA A - Editor
Address:
Ana STA STAVREVSK VREVSKA A Ljuben GUGUČ GUGUČEVSKI EVSKI
Faculty of Dentistr Dentistryy Vodnjanska 17, Skopje Republika Makedonija
Address: Faculty of Dentistry Dr Subotića 8 11000 Beograd, Serbia
Ender KAZAZOGLU - Editor
Address:
Pinar KURSOGLU Arzu CIVELEK
Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry Bagdat Cad. No 238 Göztepe 81006 Istanbul, Turkey
GREECE
CYPRUS
Anastasios MARKOPOUL MARKOPOULOS OS - Editor Address: Haralambos PETRIDIS Aristotle University Lambros ZOULOUMIS Dental School Thessaloniki, Greece
George PANTELAS - Editor Huseyn BIÇAK
Address: Gen. Hospital Nicosia
Aikaterine KOSTEA
No 10 Pallados St.
Nicosia, Cyprus
International Editorial (Advisory) (Advisory) Board
Christoph HÄMMERLE - Switzerland Barrie KENNEY
George SANDOR
- USA
- Canada
Ario SANTINI
- Great Britain
Predrag Charles LEKIC - Canada
Riita SUURONEN
- Finland
Kyösti OIKARINEN
Michael WEINLAENDER - Austria
- Finland
Y
T E I
BALKAN STOMA STOMATOLOGICAL TOLOGICAL SOCIETY
C
O
S
L
A
C I
G
O L
T O
S T O MA
Council:
President: Past President: President Elect: Vice President: Secretary General: Treasurer: Editor-in-Chief:
Members:
Prof. H. Bostanci Prof. P. Koidis Prof. N. Sharkov Prof. D. Stamenković Prof. A.L. Pissiotis Prof. S. Dalampiras Prof. Lj.Todorović
R. Qafmolla P. Kongo Ko ngo M. Ganibegović S. Kostadinović
A. Adžić M. Djuričković
A. Filchev D. Stancheva Zaburkova
M. Carčev
M. Carević M. Barjaktarević E. Kazazoglu
A. Minovska T. Lambrianidis S. Dalambiras
M. Akkaya G. Pantelas S. Solyali
N. Forna A. Bucur
The whole issue is available on-line at the web address of the BaSS (www.e-bass.org) (www.e-bass.org)
Y
T E I
C
BALKAN JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
ISSN 1107 - 1141
O
S
L
A
C I
G
O L
O
T A S T O M
Ljubomir TODOROVIĆ, DDS, MSc, PhD Faculty of Dentistry University of Belgrade Dr Subotića 8 11000 Belgrade
Editor-in-Chief
Serbia
Editorial board ROMANIA
ALBANIA
Ruzhdie QAFMOLLA - Editor Emil KUV KUVARA ARATI TI Besnik GA GAV VAZI
Address: Dental University Clinic Tirana, Albania
Alexandru-Andrei Alexandru-And rei ILIESCU - Editor
Address:
Victor NAMIGEAN
Faculty of Dentistry
Cinel MALITA
Calea Plevnei 19, sect. 1 70754 Bucuresti, Romania
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Maida GANIBEGOVIĆ - Editor Naida HADŽIABDIĆ Mihael STANOJEVIĆ
Address: Faculty of Dentistry Bolnička 4a
SERBIA
Dejan MARKOVIĆ - Editor Slavoljub ŽIVKOVIĆ Zoran STAJČIĆ
71000 Sarajevo, BIH BULGARIA
Nikolai POPOV POPOV - Editor Editor
Address:
Nikola ATANASSOV Nikolai SHARKOV
Faculty of Dentistry G. Sofiiski str. str. 1 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
TURKEY
FYROM
Julijana GJORGOV GJORGOVA A - Editor
Address:
Ana STA STAVREVSK VREVSKA A Ljuben GUGUČ GUGUČEVSKI EVSKI
Faculty of Dentistr Dentistryy Vodnjanska 17, Skopje Republika Makedonija
Address: Faculty of Dentistry Dr Subotića 8 11000 Beograd, Serbia
Ender KAZAZOGLU - Editor
Address:
Pinar KURSOGLU Arzu CIVELEK
Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry Bagdat Cad. No 238 Göztepe 81006 Istanbul, Turkey
GREECE
CYPRUS
Anastasios MARKOPOUL MARKOPOULOS OS - Editor Address: Haralambos PETRIDIS Aristotle University Lambros ZOULOUMIS Dental School Thessaloniki, Greece
George PANTELAS - Editor Huseyn BIÇAK
Address: Gen. Hospital Nicosia
Aikaterine KOSTEA
No 10 Pallados St.
Nicosia, Cyprus
International Editorial (Advisory) (Advisory) Board
Christoph HÄMMERLE - Switzerland Barrie KENNEY
George SANDOR
- USA
- Canada
Ario SANTINI
- Great Britain
Predrag Charles LEKIC - Canada
Riita SUURONEN
- Finland
Kyösti OIKARINEN
Michael WEINLAENDER - Austria
- Finland
Y
T E I
BALKAN STOMA STOMATOLOGICAL TOLOGICAL SOCIETY
C
O
S
L
A
C I
G
O L
T O
S T O MA
Council:
President: Past President: President Elect: Vice President: Secretary General: Treasurer: Editor-in-Chief:
Members:
Prof. H. Bostanci Prof. P. Koidis Prof. N. Sharkov Prof. D. Stamenković Prof. A.L. Pissiotis Prof. S. Dalampiras Prof. Lj.Todorović
R. Qafmolla P. Kongo Ko ngo M. Ganibegović S. Kostadinović
A. Adžić M. Djuričković
A. Filchev D. Stancheva Zaburkova
M. Carčev
M. Carević M. Barjaktarević E. Kazazoglu
A. Minovska T. Lambrianidis S. Dalambiras
M. Akkaya G. Pantelas S. Solyali
N. Forna A. Bucur
The whole issue is available on-line at the web address of the BaSS (www.e-bass.org) (www.e-bass.org)
BALKAN OF
JOURNAL
STOMATOLOGY
Official publication of the BALKAN STOMATOLOGICAL SOCIETY
Volume V olume 16
No 3
ISSN 1107 - 1141
November 2012
Y
T E I
C
BALKAN JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
ISSN 1107 - 1141
O
S
L
A
C I
G
O L
O
T A S T O M
VOLUME 16
NUMBER 3
NOVEMBER 2012
PAGES 129-184
Contents
LR
I. Markou A. Kana A. Arhakis
Natal and Neonatal Teeth: Teeth: A Review of the Literature
132
LR
E. Lioliou A. Kostas L. Zouloumis
The Maxillary Labial Fraenum A Controversy Controversy of Oral Surgeons vs. Orthodontists
141
OP
L. Kanurkova J. Gjorgova B. Dzipunova N. Toseska Toseska A. Dorakovska M. Popovska M. Pandilova
Association between Condylar Position and Tilt of Frontal Occlusal Plane in Patients with Transversal and Vertical Dentofacial Discrepancy
147
OP
E. Kongo Xh. Mulo
Cephalometric Features of Class III Malocclusion among Albanian Patients Seeking Orthodontic Treatment
154
OP
E. Zabokova-Bilbilova A. Sotirovska-Ivkovska B. Evrosimovska L. Kanurkova
Effect of Fluoride Varnish Varnish on Demineralization Adjacent to Orthodontic Brackets
157
OP
M. Carcev B. Getova O. Sarakinova H. Petanovski S. Carceva-Shalja
Sealing of Fissures and Pits of First Permanent Molar at Children with High Caries Risk
161
OP
S. Georgieva M. Pandilova L. Zendeli-Bedzeti
Use of Topical Bio-stimulative Laser Therapy among Individuals with Glossopyrosis and Hypochromic Anaemia
165
Balk J Stom, Vol Vol 16, 2012
131
OP
J. Nikolovska D. Petrovski
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) Before and After Prosthodontic Treatment with Full Removable Dentures
169
OP
A. Uludamar F. Ayke Aykent nt
Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Zirconia Ceramics with Different Surface Treatments Treatments
173
CR
U. Cılasun E.AlperSınanoglu S.Yılmaz E.Guzeldemır G.Alnıacık
An Unusual Laryngeal Complication Following Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
179
CR
N. Güler
Surgical Planning of Bilaterally Impacted Maxillary Third Molars by Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
181
Y
T E I
C
BALKAN JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
O
S
L
A
C I
ISSN 1107 - 1141
G
O L
O
T A S T O M
Natal and Neonatal Teeth: A Review of the Literature
SUMMARY
I. Markou, A. Kana, A. Arhakis
Normal eruption of primary teeth into the oral cavity begins at about 6 months of child’s age. Teeth that erupt prematurely have occasionally been reported in the medical and dental literature and have been referred to as congenital teeth, foetal teeth, pre-deciduous teeth and dentitio praecox. The most affected teeth are lower central incisors and only 1-10% of them are supernumerary teeth. The incidence of natal and neonatal teeth ranges from 1:2000 to 1:3500. The exact etiology has not been proved yet, but there is a correlation between natal teeth and hereditary, environmental factors and some syndromes. The management of the case depends on clinical characteristics of the natal or neonatal teeth, as well as on complications they might cause. The aim of this text is to present a literature review on important aspects of natal and neonatal teeth concerning prevalence, etiology, clinical and histological characteristics, differential diagnosis, complications and management. Keywords: Natal Teeth; Neonatal Teeth
Introduction Typical eruption of primary teeth begins at about 6 months of age. Teeth observed at birth are considered as natal teeth, while teeth observed within the first 30 days as neonatal teeth, based on the classification given by Massler and Savara in 1950 according to the time of eruption78. In 1966, Spouge and Feasby categorized these teeth based on clinical features as mature and immature 110. Mature are those which are fully developed in shape and comparable in morphology to the deciduous teeth; immature are the teeth whose structure and development are incomplete. Finally, Hebling in 1997 presented 4 clinical categories 44: - Shell-shaped crown loosely attached to the alveolus by gingival tissue and absence of a root; - Solid crown loosely attached to the alveolus by gingival tissue and little or no root; - Eruption of the incisal margin of the crown through gingival tissue; - Mucosal swelling with the tooth non-erupted but palpable.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Dentistry Thessaloniki, Greece
LITERATURE REVIEW (LR) Balk J Stom, 2012; 16:132-140
The rare occurrence of natal and neonatal teeth was associated in the past with superstition and folklore. Today this phenomenon creates great interest and concern, not only to parents but to clinicians as well. This is due to their clinical characteristics (small size, conical shape, and great mobility) which are the cause of certain complications (laceration of mother’s breasts, sublingual ulceration, and danger of aspiration of the teeth).
History The rare occurrence of natal and neonatal teeth has led to association with superstition and folklore. Some cultures have believed that children born with teeth were favoured, particularly in Western Europe and Malaysia, whereas other considered natal teeth as an ill omen. In England it was believed that natal teeth showed that the children would grow into famous soldiers, in France and Italy that they ‘would get on in the world’ and in Sweden that they could cure an injured finger if it were placed in
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012
Natal and Neonatal Teeth 133
their mouth. In many places like Poland India and Africa superstition still prevails considering these children to be monsters or evil children 14. Among several native African tribes, such as in urban Bariba in Benin West Africa, one of the most dangerous signs suggesting a witch child is to be born with teeth and if that happened the child was either abandoned or killed. Precautions in the form of a purification ritual are still taken today in such cases, and sometimes the teeth will be extracted 101. In China a child born with teeth suggests misfortune for the family: if the child is male then the father will die and if it is a female the mother. Many historic personalities, like Hannibal, Cardinal Richelieu, Broca, Zoroaster, Napoleon, English King Richard the III and King Louis XIV of France are said to be born with teeth. Also many proverbs and apothegms are made up for natal teeth, such as ‘The one
whose teeth grow early, will early sink into the grave’ 14. Due to these superstitions it is suggested that a transcultural approach be adopted in managing cases in which the parents feel particularly anxious and uncomfortable about prematurely erupted teeth in order to cater for the social well-being of the child and family 88.
Prevalence Many authors have reviewed the incidence of natal and neonatal teeth (Table 1). The estimated prevalence ranges from 1:10 to 1:30.000. It is accepted by many authors that the ratio of natal and neonatal teeth is somewhere between 1:2000 and 1:3500 14,23,24,78,110,123.
Table 1. Prevalence of natal and neonatal teeth Natal and neonatal teeth
Author(s)
Location of study
Magicot (1883) 71
Paris, France
3
17.578
1:6.000
Howkins (1932) 48
Birmingham, England
1
10.000
1:10.000
Massler and Savara (1950) 78
Chicago, USA
7
9.400
1:2.000
Allwright (1958)3
Hong Kong, China
2
6.817
1:3.400
Mayhall (1967) 80
Juneau, Alaska (Tlinget Indians)
8
90
Gordon and Langley (1970) 41
Oklahoma, USA (American Indian)
4
407
Jarvis and Gorlin (1972) 50
Alaska, USA (Eskimo)
Anderson (1982) 5
Columbia, USA
Kates et al (1984)
52
16
Total births
1.571
Prevalence
1:11.25 1:100 1:98 1:800
Boston, USA
13
18.155
1:3.667
Leung (1989) 67
Alberta, Canada
15
50.892
1:3.392
King and Lee (1989) 57
Hong Kong, China
17
22.500
1:1.324
Gladen et al (1990) 39
Taiwan
13
Rusmah (1991) 100
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
To (1991)117
128
1:10
4
9.600
1:2.325
Hong Kong, China
48
53.678
1:1.118
Diaz-Romero et al (1991) 30
Mexico
31
1.200
De Almeida and Gomide (1995) 27
Brazil
47*
Alaluusua et al (2002) 2
Finland
34
Liu and Huang (2004) 70
Taipei, Taiwan
Freudenberger et al (2008) 36
Mexico
1019** 34.457
1:38,7 1:22 1:1.013
2
420
1:140
50
2182
2.3:100
* 14 with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and 33 with bilateral cleft lip and palate **692 with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and 327 with bilateral cleft lip and palate
134 I. Markou et al.
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012
The prevalence of occurrence of natal and neonatal teeth in males and females is controversial, with some authors giving a higher ratio for females 3,5,23, 36, 52, 65,78, Kates et al 54 reporting a 66% proportion for females against a 31% proportion for males, and others suggesting that there isn’t any correlation with gender 14,25,106. Natal teeth are more common than neonatal teeth14,23,33,57,78,110.
Etiology The exact etiology of natal and neonatal teeth has not been elucidated yet. Many theories have been expressed regarding the cause of the occurrence of these teeth. One of them includes dietary deficiencies 3 or hypovitaminosis due to poor maternal health, endocrine disturbances and
pyelitis during pregnancy15. Another theory refers to hormonal stimulation, meaning the excessive secretion of pituitary, thyroid or gonads 78. It is also significant to mention that congenital syphilis seems to have varying effect; in some cases premature eruption was noticed, while in others the eruption was retarded 15. Moreover, febrile states can affect the normal eruption of teeth, for example fever and exanthemata during pregnancy can cause premature eruption 78. The hereditary factor is assumed a possible cause of natal teeth. Zhu and King (1995) 123 have reported natal teeth as a familiar trait in 8-62% of cases. Bondenhoff and Gorlin (1963) 14 reported family association in 14.5% of cases, while Kates et al (1984) 52 found a positive family history in 7 out of 38 cases of natal and neonatal teeth. A hereditary transmission of an autosomal dominant gene has also been suggested 24,49.
Table 2. Syndromes and developmental disturbances related to natal and neonatal teeth Syndromes and developmental disturbances
Author(s)
Ellis-Van Creveld syndrome
Himelhoch(1988) 47; Kurian et al(2007) 64
Hallerman-Streiff syndrome
Fonseca and Mueller(1995) 35; Oshihi et al (1986) 87
Patent ductus arrteriosus and intestinal pseudo-obstruction
Harris et al (1976) 43
Opitz (G/BBB) syndrome
Shaw et al (2006)103
Van der Woude syndrome
Hersh and Verdi (1992) 46
Pachyonychia congenital (Jadasshon- Lewandawsky syndrome)
Feinstein et al (1988) 34
Steatocystoma multiplex
King and Lee (1987) 56 Pivnick et al (2000), Arboleda (1997); Byung-Duk and Jung-Wook (2006); Castiñeyra et al (1992), Korniszewski et al (2001) 91,7,18,22,62 Alvarez et al (1993) 4
Wiedermann-Rautenstrauch neonatal progeria Pfeiffer syndrome type 3 Walker Warburg syndrome (Congenital hydrocephalus with congenital glaucoma)
Mandal et al (2002)73
Hyper IgE syndrome
Roshan et al (2009) 98
Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome
Hennekam and Van Doorne (1990) 45
Bifid tongue and profound sensorineural hearing loss
Darwish, Sastry and Ruprecht (1987) 26
Cyclopia
Boyd and Miles (1951) 16
Transient Pseudohypoparathyroidism
Koklu and Kurtoglu (2007) 61
Pierre Robin syndrome
Kharbanda et al (1985) 54
Down syndrome
Ndiokwelu et al (2004) [85]
Short rib-polydactyly syndrome type II (Saldino-Noonan syndrome )
Strømme Koppang, Boman and Hoel (1983) 113
Soto’s syndrome
Callanan, Anand and Sheehy (2009) 20
Adrenogenital syndrome
Leung (1989) 67
Epidermolysis bullosa simplex
Liu, Chen and Miles (1998) 69
Cleft lip-palate
Cabate et al (2000)19
Odonto-Tricho-Ungual-Digital-Palmar Syndrome
Mendoza and Valiente (1997) 81
Bloch-Sulzberger syndrome (incontinentia pigmenti)
Wolf (2007) 122
Goltz syndrome
Dias et al (2010) 28
Teebi hypertelorism syndrome
Koenig (2003) 59
Clouston syndrome
Reynolds, Gold and Scriver (1971) 96
Finlay-Marks Syndrome
Taniai et al (2004) 114
Beare-Stevenson Syndrome
Tao et al (2010) 115
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012
Natal and Neonatal Teeth 135
Another theory explaining the premature eruption is they occur in pairs 65,123. The eruption of more than 2 teeth is rare. Despite that, Masatomi et al 77 in 1991 reported an considered to be the abnormal position of the germ during its development in the alveolar bone 8,97. Furthermore, 18-month-old Japanese boy with 14 natal teeth, Gonçalves Clergueau-Guerithault proposed that the eruption of natal et al40 in 1998 presented the case of a newborn with 12 natal teeth and Portela et al 92 in 2004 reported a newborn and neonatal teeth could be dependent on osteoblastic with 11 natal teeth. activity within the area of the tooth germ 102. Natal teeth are described as conical or normal in As far as environmental factors are concerned, some environmental toxins are considered to be size and shape, yellowish, with hypoplastic enamel and 37,100,123. causative factors. Gladden et al (1990) 39 reported that dentin, and poor or absent root development 13 of 128 newborns, whose mothers where exposed to The hypoplastic enamel might be related to gingival 52 and has a tendency to discolour. The polychlorinated binephyls and dibenzofurans during the covering Yusheng environmental accident in Taiwan, had natal incomplete root formation is the reason for the great teeth. Also, 2 out of 12 live-borns from parents poisoned mobility of the natal and neonatal teeth. As far as histological characteristics are concerned, by PCBs in Kyushu, Japan were reported to have natal 82 2 despite the normal basic structure of the natal teeth, teeth . Another report by Alaluusua et al (2002) supports that there is no association between milk levels early eruption is associated with hypo-mineralization of 52 of polychlorinated binephyls, and dibenzofurans and the the enamel, which is usually described as dysplastic , occurrence of natal teeth. They suggest that the prevailing reduced in thickness and covering only the two thirds of 6,42 111 levels of polychlorinated binephyls and dibenzofurans are the crown , but has a normal ultrastructure . Complete 3,78 likely below the threshold to cause prenatal eruptions of absence of enamel is noted rarely . The enamel for the age of the child is normal but since the tooth erupts teeth. Moreover, the presence of natal and neonatal prematurely the matrix of the non-calcified enamel wears teeth has been associated with many syndromes and off in time and this is probably the reason why their developmental disturbances but there is no conclusive crowns look small in size and appear yellow brown in colour 52. The dentino-enamel junction seems irregular 42. evidence of a correlation with these systemic conditions 25. Dentin and predentin appear normal coronally, The conditions that are related with the appearance of but become irregular and with reduced number of natal teeth are shown in the table 2. dentinal tubules and large inter-globular spaces with Natal and neonatal teeth have also been reported in 14,16,42 cervically and bonelike cutis gyratum and acanthosis nigricans 10, Turnpenny abnormal cell inclusions apically resembling osteodentin, which is attributed to ectodermal dysplasia 119, in association with primary stimulation by movement of the teeth. It has been further congenital glaucoma 72, in a case of an anencephalic suggested that the mobility may cause degeneration of infant with cleft palate 74, in association with giant Hertwig’s sheath, thus preventing root development and congenital nevocellular nevus 53, in a case of restrictive stabilization109. Increased mobility causes histological dermopathy79, in a case of multiple joint dislocations with changes in the cervical dentin and cementum 6,42,109. metaphyseal dysplasia90, in a case of multiple anomalies: Cementum is either absent 14 or, if present, shows variation natal teeth, palatal cyst, bilateral lymphangiomas of the in thickness covers the cervical third of the crown and alveolar ridge and median alveolar notch 21, in a case of is usually acellurar 42. The pulp tissue has a normal complex craniofacial anomalies 112, in Mohr syndrome 9 appearance but the pulp cavity and the radicular canals are and in association with syringomas and oligodontia 83. wider 6,42,110. It is suggested that tooth abnormalities are dysmorphic In neonatal teeth the differences from normal markers of earlier developmental abnormalities, and could primary dentition are less pronounced due to their more give warning signs in a syndrome diagnosis 13. mature state at the time of eruption 6. Root formation in natal and neonatal teeth is grossly deficient 14.
Clinical and Histological Characteristics
Differential Diagnosis
Regarding clinical characteristics, the most affected Most of the teeth that occur in the oral cavity at birth teeth are the lower primary central incisors (85%), or during the first days of life represent the early eruption followed by the maxillary incisors (11%), mandibular of the normal primary deciduous dentition 44,65. The canines and molars (3%) and maxillary canines and prevalence of supernumerary teeth has been suggested molars (1%)123. Another characteristic of natal teeth is that to range from 1-10% 17,37,123. At this point, it is important
136 I. Markou et al. to mention the need of radiographic examination, in order to differentiate the premature eruption of a primary deciduous tooth from a supernumerary tooth 15,25,65. Moreover, radiographic verification reveals the root development of the tooth, adjacent structures and the existence of a relative germ in the primary dentition. There are also 3 types of inclusion cysts that might be confused with natal teeth: Epstein’s pearls, Bohn’s nodules and dental lamina cysts. Epstein’s pearls are located along the mid-palatine raphe in the line of fusion of embryonic palatal processes. They are true cysts derived from residual ectodermal cells covering these processes. The cysts are lined by stratified squamous epithelium and the lumen contains keratin 24. Bohn’s nodules are usually multiple and located along the buccal and lingual aspects of the mandibular and maxillary ridges68. They represent remnants of minor mucous salivary glands. They are true cysts comprised of stratified squamous epithelium lining a dense fibrous connective tissue wall that contains mucous acinar cells and wellformed ducts. The clinical appearance of Epstein’s pearls and Bohn’s nodules is similar. They are both small white-gray, raised nodules, 0.5-3 mm in diameter and no treatment is necessary 24. The third type of cyst is dental lamina cyst which appears as single or multiple swellings on the maxillary or mandibular ridges. These cysts, also known as gingival cysts of the newborn, are lined by thin epithelium and show a lumen usually filled with desquamated keratin, occasionally containing inflammatory cells. It is believed that they are created by fragments of dental lamina that remain within the alveolar ridge mucosa after tooth formation. Most of them degenerate and involute or rupture into the oral cavity within two weeks to five months of postnatal life63. Furthermore, natal teeth should be discriminated from epulis and odontogenic hamartomas. Epulis are tumour-like growths of the gum that might be either sessile or pedunculated, and are reactive rather than neoplastic lesions 68. Odontogenic hamartomas are tumour-like lesions, without the growth characteristics of a neoplasm, and develop during the time dental structures remain capable of further development and maturation 38.
Complications Problems that arise from the presence of natal and neonatal teeth include interruption in breastfeeding 93 either by pain on suckling or by ulceration of the mother’s nipples, but the infant’s tongue usually overlies the lower incisors while nursing and any trauma will be to the infants tongue rather than mother’s
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012 breast106, inflammation of the surrounding tissues, pain associated with mobility, which all may lead to refusal to nurse52. Although no case is reported, there is usually a concern about aspiration or swallowing of the teeth due to excessive mobility or spontaneous exfoliation 95. Furthermore there can be teething symptoms just as with eruption of the primary teeth 52 or even infantile diarrhea, drooling and malaise106,110 . The development of an abscess, probably due to the loss of attachment, has also been reported32,51. A complication that is common with natal teeth is ulceration of the tip or the ventral surface of the tongue, known as Riga-Fede disease. The ulceration occurs after repetitive tongue thrusting not only in newborns but also to elder infants with the eruption of the primary mandibular central incisors and in children with familiar dysanatomia107. There has also been a report of prenatal ulceration of the tongue due to natal teeth 58. The lesion begins as an ulcerated area and with repeated trauma it may progress to an enlarged fibrous mass with the appearance of a granuloma. The pain occurring from the ulceration often results on dehydration, feeding difficulties and discomfort. It also may lead to bleeding and in a child with other medical problems a potential of infection is added to the concerns 107. Periapical abscess is possible because enamel breakdown may lead to carries 52. Another complication in children with cleft lip-palate is the potential interference in naso-alveolar moulding 124. There have also been reported a case of reactive fibrous hyperplasia by a natal tooth 106, hypoplasia of primary and permanent teeth following osteitis due to infection by neonatal tooth 55 and also microdontic teeth succedaneous to natal teeth, suggesting that there might be some unknown developmental influence common to the occurrence of natal teeth and abnormally small (mesiodistal dimension) permanent successors 75 and in neonatal orthopaedics31.
Management The treatment plan for natal and neonatal teeth has many factors to consider. If the tooth is not interfering with the nutrient intake of the child and is otherwise asymptomatic no intervention should be made 78. Although it is difficult to determine initially whether root formation will occur in natal or neonatal teeth 104 those teeth that are stable beyond 4 months have a good prognosis 52. The retention of a natal tooth, which is part of the normal primary dentition, is suggested because of possible space loss, although the opinions differ 23,32,38. If the tooth is supernumerary or has an excessive mobility, if it is poorly developed or is associated with soft tissue growth 106 or if
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012
Natal and Neonatal Teeth 137
it interferes with naso-alveolar moulding 124 or presents Paediatric dentists should educate parents 32,51,52 an abscess, the treatment of choice is extraction . and medical community about the preferred treatment and should conduct any necessary extraction in order Before extraction, a dental radiograph should be obtained in order to inform the parents of possible complications to prevent trauma. The child should be re-evaluated and to get their consent. It is suggested to leave the tooth periodically to ensure oral health. Management of natal and neonatal teeth should consist of concern to avoid in the mouth as long as possible in order to decrease the possibility of removing permanent tooth buds with the any complication, to make early diagnosis and provide natal tooth or risk defecting them 76. The possibility of adequate treatment. hypoprothrombinaemia should be taken into consideration as the commensal flora of the intestine might not have been established until the child is 10 days old. Since Conclusion vitamin K is essential for the production of prothrombin in the liver it should be administered before extraction Natal and neonatal teeth are rare conditions (0.5-1.0 mg, intramuscularly) if the routine postnatal in infancy. Most commonly involved teeth are the injection is not given 32. Also, haemophilia should be mandibular central incisors. Despite the fact that the investigated38. The extraction is usually done under local exact etiology is still unknown, superficial position of anaesthesia but can also be done without anaesthesia the tooth germ with association of hereditary factors is depending on the gingival attachment, with the use of the most accepted possibility. Many complications may gauze as a pharyngeal guard 32. After the extraction, it is occur with the nursing problem most commonly reviewed. advised to curette the socket to prevent the cells of the Treatment and periodic follow-up should be conducted by dental papillae from continuing to develop and erupting as a paediatric dentist. odontogenic remnants 11,25,108. If curettage is to become the routine treatment, then the injection of local anaesthetic to provide adequate anaesthesia would be required 32. Residual natal teeth have been reported with a risk of References formatting without curettage about 9.1% 32, 86, myxoid 1. Agostini M, León JE, Kellermann MG, Valiati R, Graner calcified hamartoma 1, pulp polyp as erupted remnants 121, E, de Almeida OP . Myxoid calcified hamartoma and natal pyogenic granuloma due to trauma during extraction 84 and teeth: A case report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol , 2008; peripheral ossifying fibroma 60. 72(12):1879-1883. Riga- Fede disease is another complication of 2. Alaluusua S, Kiviranta H, Leppäniemi A, Hölttä P, Lukinmaa P-, Lope L, et al . Natal and neonatal teeth in natal teeth and neonatal teeth but it’s not an indication relation to environmental toxicants. Pediatr Res, 2002; for extraction78. The treatment options include 52(5):652-655. smoothing off the incisal edges of lower incisors 3. Allwright WC . Natal and neonatal teeth: a study among with an abrasive instrument 3, modifying feeding Chinese in Hong Kong. Br Dent J , 1958; 105:163-172. behaviour or feeding devise, treatment of symptoms 4. Alvarez MP, Crespi PV, Shanske AL. Natal molars in Pfeiffer syndrome type 3: A case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent , 1993; with oral triamcinolone acetonide in orabase applied 18(1):21-24. on the lesion (Kenalog® in Orabase® Triamcinolone 5. Anderson RA. Natal and neonatal teeth: Histologic Acetonide Dental Paste USP, APOTHECON® investigation of two black females. ASDC J Dent Child , A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company), or placement of 1982; 49(4):300-303. composite over the edges of the insicors 89,107. As many 6. Anneroth G, Isacsson G, Lindwall AM, Linge G. Clinical, histologic and microradiographic study of natal, neonatal natal and neonatal teeth have hypo-mineralised enamel and pre-erupted teeth. Scand J Dent Res, 1978; 86(1):58-66. and are difficult to access and keep adequate moisture 7. Arboleda H, Quintero L, Yunis E . Wiedemanncontrol, the bonding of the resin is questionable and Rautenstrauch neonatal progeroid syndrome: report of three presents the risk of swallowing or inhaling it. In cases of new patients. J Med Genet , 1997; 34:433-437. mild-to-moderate irritation to the tongue, such treatment 8. Baghdadi ZD. Riga-fede disease: Report of a case and may suffice. If the ulcerated area is large, however, even review. J Clin Pediatr Dent , 2001; 25(3):209-213. 9. Balci S, Güler G, Kale G, Söylemezoĝlu F, Besim A. Mohr the reduced incisal edge may still contact and traumatize syndrome in two sisters: Prenatal diagnosis in a 22-weekthe tongue during suckling to such an extent that would old fetus with post-mortem findings in both. Prenat Diagn , delay healing 86,118. The fact that the lesion could reoccur 1999; 19(9):827-831. should also be taken into consideration 89,107. If none of 10. Beare JM, Dodge JA, Nevin NC . Cutis gyratum, acanthosis the more conservative measures is effective, the option is nigricans and other congenital anomalies. A new syndrome. extraction of the tooth or even excision of the lesion 107. Br J Dermatol , 1969; 81(4):241-247.
138 I. Markou et al. 11. Berendsen WJ, Wakkerman HL. Continued growth of the dentinal papillae after extraction of neonatal teeth: Report of case. ASDC J Dent Child , 1988; 55(2):139-141. 12. Berman DS, Silverstone LM . Natal and neonatal teeth. A clinical and histological study. Br Dent J , 1975; 139(9):361364. 13. Bloch-Zupan A. When Neuropediatrics Meets Odontology. Neuropediatrics, 2007; 38:57-58. 14. Bodenhoff J, Gorlin RJ . Natal and neonatal teeth: Folklore and fact. Pediatrics, 1963; 32:1087-1093. 15. Boras VV, Zaini ZM, Savage NW . Supernumerary tooth with associated dentigerous cyst in an infant. A case report and review of differential diagnosis. Aust Dent J , 2007; 52(2):150-153. 16. Boyd JD, Miles AE . An erupted tooth in a cyclops foetus. Br Dent J , 1951; 91(7):173-181. 17. Buchanan S, Jenkins CR. Riga-fedes syndrome: Natal or neonatal teeth associated with tongue ulceration. Case report. Aust Dent J , 1997; 42(4):225-227. 18. Byung-Duk A, Jung-Wook K . Hallermann-Streiff syndrome: those are not supernumerary teeth. J Pediatr , 2006; 148:415. 19. Cabate HF, Gomide MR, Costa B. Evaluation of primary dentition in cleft lip and palate children with and without natal/neonatal teeth. Cleft Palate Craniofac J , 2000; 37:406-409. 20. Callanan AP, Anand P, Sheehy EC . Sotos syndrome with hypodontia. Int J Paediatr Dent , 2006; 16(2):143-146. 21. Camm JH, Mourino AP . Multiple anomalies of a newborn: Report of case. J Am Dent Assoc, 1987; 114(3):335-336. 22. Castiñeyra G, Panal M, Lopez Presas H, Goldschmidt E, Sánchez JM . Two sibs with Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome: possibilities of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound. J Med Genet , 1992; 29(6):434-436. 23. Chow MH . Natal and neonatal teeth. J Am Dent Assoc, 1980; 100(2):215-216. 24. Cohen RL. Clinical perspectives on premature tooth eruption and cyst formation in neonates. Pediatr Dermatol , 1984; 1(4):301-306. 25. Cunha RF, Boer FAC, Torriani DD, Frossard WTG . Natal and neonatal teeth: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent , 2001; 23(2):158-162. 26. Darwish S, Sastry KA, Ruprecht A . Natal teeth, bifid tongue and deaf mutism. J Oral Med , 1987; 42(1):49-56. 27. De Almeida CM, Gomide MR. Prevalence of natal/ neonatal teeth in cleft lip and palate infants. Cleft PalateCraniofacial Journal , 1996; 33(4):297-299. Dias C, Basto J, Pinho O, Barbêdo C, Mártins M, Bornholdt 28. D, et al . A nonsense porcn mutation in severe focal dermal hypoplasia with natal teeth. Fetal and Pediatric Pathology, 2010; 29(5):305-513. 29. Dias PF, Guimaraes LF, Sanchez AN, Primo LG. Rehabilitation of a Child with History of Multiple Natal Teeth and Oligodontia in the Permanent Dentition. Rev Fac Odontol Porto Alegre, 2009; 50(2):18-21. 30. Díaz-Romero RM, Shor-Hass F, Benitez-Tirado C, Fernández-Carrocera L. [Anomalies of the oral cavity in Mexican neonates]. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex, 1991; 48(11):832-835. 31. Durning P, MacLeod RI . A neonatal tooth in a cleft palate baby: A complicating feature in neonatal orthopaedics - a case report. J Paediatr Dent , 1988; 4(1):27-31.
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012 32. Dyment H, Anderson R, Humphrey J, Chase I . Residual neonatal teeth: A case report. J Can Dent Assoc, 2005; 71(6):394-397. 33. El Khatib K, Abouchadi A, Nassih M, Rzin A, Jidal B, Danino A, et al . Natal teeth: Apropos of five cases. Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale, 2005; 106(6):325-327. 34. Feinstein A, Friedman J, Schewach-Millet M . Pachyonychia congenita. J Am Acad Dermatol , 1988; 19(4):705-711. 35. Fonseca MA, Mueller WA. Hallermann-streiff syndrome: Case report and recommendations for dental care. J Dent Child , 1995; 61:334-337. 36. Freudenberger S, Santos Díaz MÁ, Bravo JM, Sedano HO. Intraoral findings and other developmental conditions in mexican neonates. J Dent Child , 2008; 75(3):280-286. 37. Galassi MS, Santos-Pinto L, Ramalho LT . Natal maxillary primary molars: case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent , 2004; 29(1):41-44. 38. Gardiner JH . Erupted teeth in the newborn. Proc R Soc Med , 1961; 54:504-506. 39. Gladen BC, Taylor JS, Wu Y-, Ragan NB, Rogan WJ, Hsu C-. Dermatological findings in children exposed transplacentally to heat-degraded polychlorinated biphenyls in Taiwan. Br J Dermatol , 1990; 122(6):799-808. 40. Gonçalves FA, Birman EG, Sugaya NN, Melo AM . Natal teeth: review of the literature and report of an unusual case. Braz Dent J , 1998; 9(1):53-56. 41. Gordon RC, Langley RN . Natal teeth in American Indian children. J Pediatr , 1970; 76(4):613-614. 42. Hals E . Natal and neonatal teeth. Histologic investigations in two brothers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol , 1957; 10(5):509-521. 43. Harris DJ, Ashcraft KW, Beatty EC . Natal teeth, patent ductus arteriosus and intestinal pseudo obstruction: A lethal syndrome in the newborn. Clin Genet , 1976; 9(5):479-482. 44. Hebling J, Zuanon ACC, Vianna DR. Dente Natal - A Case of natal teeth. Odontol Clin, 1997; 7:37-40. 45. Hennekam RCM, Van Doorne JM . Oral aspects of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am J Med Genet , 1990(Suppl. 6):42-47. 46. Hersh JH, Verdi GD. Natal teeth in monozygotic twins with Van der Woude syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J , 1992; 29(3):279-281. 47. Himelhoch DA, Mostofi R. Oral abnormalities in the Ellisvan Creveld syndrome: Case report. Pediatr Dent , 1988; 10(4):309-313. 48. Howkins C . Congenital teeth. Br Dent Assoc, 1932; 53:402-405. 49. Hyatt Sr. HW . Natal Teeth. It’s occurrence in five siblings. Clin Pediatr , 1965; 4:46-48. 50. Jarvis A, Gorlin RJ . Minor orofacial abnormalities in an Eskimo population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol , 1972; 33(3):417-427. 51. Kamboj M, Chougule R. Neonatal tooth-how dangerous can it be? J Clin Pediatr Dent , 2009; 34(1):59-60. 52. Kates GA, Needleman HL, Holmes LB. Natal and neonatal teeth: A clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc, 1984; 109(3):441443. 53. Karthikeyan G, Kumar P, Narang A. Giant congenital nevocellular nevus and natal teeth. Indian Pediatr , 1996; 33(5):417-419.
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012 54. Kharbanda OP, Kaushik A, Kumar R, Sadhna, Kumar P . Pierre robin syndrome with neonatal teeth. A case report. J Indian Dent Assoc, 1985; 57(9):345-347. 55. Kimoto S, Suga H, Yamaguchi M, Uchimura N, Ikeda M, Kakizawa T . Hypoplasia of primary and permanent teeth following osteitis and the implications of delayed diagnosis of a neonatal maxillary primary molar. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2003; 13(1):35-40. 56. King NM, Lee AMP . Natal teeth and steatocystoma multiplex: A newly recognized syndrome. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol , 1987; 7(3):311-317. 57. King NM, Lee AMP . Prematurely erupted teeth in newborn infants. J Pediatr , 1989; 114(5):807-809. 58. Kinirons MJ . Prenatal ulceration of the tongue seen in association with a natal tooth. J Oral Med , 1985; 40(3):108-109. 59. Koenig R. Teebi hypertelorism syndrome. Clin Dysmorphol , 2003; 12(3):187-189. 60. Kohli K . Peripheral ossifying fibroma associated with a neonatal tooth: Case report. Pediatr Dent , 1998; 20(7):428-429. 61. Koklu E, Kurtoglu S . Natal teeth and neonatal transient pseudohypoparathyroidism in a newborn. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2007; 20(9):971. 62. Korniszewski L, Nowak R, Okninska-Hoffmann E, Skorka A, Gieruszczak-Biatek D, Sawadro-Rochowska M . Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch (neonatal progeroid) syndrome: New case with normal telomere length in skin fibroblasts. Am J Med Genet , 2001; 103(2):144-148. 63. Kumar A, Grewal H, Verma M . Dental lamina cyst of newborn: A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent , 2008; 26:175-176 64. Kurian K, Shanmugam S, Harshvardhan T, Gupta S . Chondroectodermal dysplasia (Ellis van Creveld syndrome): A report of three cases with review of literature. Indian J Dent Res, 2007; 18:31-34. 65. Leung AK . Natal teeth. Am J Dis Child , 1986; 140(3):249-251. 66. Leung AK . Management of natal teeth. J Am Dent Assoc, 1987; 114(6):762. 67. Leung AK . Incidence of natal and neonatal teeth. J Pediatr , 1989; 115(6):1024. 68. Leung AK, Robson WL . Natal Teeth: A Review. J Natl Med Assoc, 2006; 98(2):226-228. 69. Liu HH, Chen CJ, Miles DA. Epidermolysis bullosa simplex: review and report of case. ASDC J Dent Child , 1998; 65(5):349-353. 70. Liu M, Huang W . Oral abnormalities in Taiwanese newborns. J Dent Child , 2004; 71(2):118-120. 71. Magitot E . Anomalies in the erupton of the teeth in man. Br J Dent Sc, 1883; 26:640-641. 72. Mandal AK . Primary congenital glaucoma and erupted teeth (natal teeth) in the newborn: A report of two cases. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers, 2001; 32(5):419-421. 73. Mandal AK, Hornby SJ, Jones RB. Congenital hydrocephalus associated with congenital glaucoma and natal teeth. Indian J Ophthalmol , 2002; 50:322-323. 74. Marakoglu K, Percin EF, Marakoglu I, Gursoy UK, Goze F . Anencephalic infant with cleft palate and natal teeth: A case report. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal , 2004; 41(4):456-458.
Natal and Neonatal Teeth 139 75. Marcushamer M, King DL, McCourt Jr. JW . Microdontic teeth succedaneous to natal teeth: A report of two cases. Pediatr Dent , 1992; 14(6):400-401. 76. Martinez CR. Management of natal teeth. J Fam Pract , 1978; 6(3):654-655. 77. Masatomi Y, Abe K, Ooshima T . Unusual multiple natal teeth: Case report. Pediatr Dent , 1991; 13(3):170-172. 78. Massler M, Savara BS . Natal and neonatal teeth; a review of 24 cases reported in the literature. J Pediatr , 1950; 36(3):349-359. 79. Mau U, Kendziorra H, Kaiser P, Enders H . Restrictive dermopathy: Report and review. Am J Med Genet , 1997; 71(2):179-185. 80. Mayhall JT . Natal and neonatal teeth among the Tlinget indians. J Dent Res, 1967; 46(4):748-749. 81. Mendoza HR, Valiente MD. A newly recognized autosomal dominant ectodermal dysplasia syndrome: the odontotricho-ungual-digital-palmar syndrome. Am J Med Genet , 1997; 71(2):144-149. 82. Miller RW . Congenital PCB poisoning: A reevaluation. Environ Health Perspect , 1985; 60:211-214. 83. Morrison PJ, Young ID. Syringomas, natal teeth and oligodontia: a new ectodermal dysplasia? Clin Dysmorphol , 1996; 5(4):363-366. 84. Muench MG, Layton S, Wright JM . Pyogenic granuloma associated with a natal tooth: Case report. Pediatr Dent , 1992; 14(4):265-267. 85. Ndiokwelu E, Adimora GN, Ibeziako N . Neonatal teeth association with Down’s syndrome. A case report. Odontostomatol Trop, 2004; 27(107):4-6. 86. Ooshima T, Mihara J, Saito T, Sobue S . Eruption of toothlike structure following the exfoliation of natal tooth: Report of case. ASDC J Dent Child , 1986; 53(4):275-278. 87. Oshihi M, Murakami E, Haita T, Naruse T, Sugino M, Inomata H . Hallermann-streiff syndrome and its oral implications. J Dent Child , 1986; 53:32-37. 88. Oyejide CO, Aderinokun GA. Beliefs about prematurely erupted teeth in rural yoruba communities, Nigeria. Public Health, 1992; 106(6):465-471. 89. Padmanabhan MY, Pandey RK, Aparna R, Radhakrishnan V . Neonatal sublingual traumatic ulceration - case report & review of the literature. Dental Traumatology, 2010; 26(6):490-495. 90. Phaoke SR, Sharma AK, Agarawal SS . A new syndrome of multiple joint dislocations with metaphyseal dysplasia. Clin Dysmorphol , 1993; 2(3):264-268. 91. Pivnick EK, Angle B, Kaufman RA, Hall BD,
Pitukcheewanont P, Hersh JH, Fowlkes JL, Sanders LP, O’Brien JM, Carroll GS, Gunther WM, Morrow HG, Burghen GA, Ward JC . Neonatal progeroid (WiedemannRautenstrauch) syndrome: report of five new cases and review. Am J Med Genet , 2000; 90(2):131-140. 92. Portela MB, Damasceno L, Primo LG. Unusual case of multiple natal teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent , 2004; 29(1):37-39. 93. Primo LG, Alves AC, Pomarico I, Gleiser R. Interruption of breast feeding caused by the presence of neonatal teeth. Braz Dent J , 1995; 6(2):137-142. 94. Rao BB, Mamatha GR, Zameera KN, Hegde RB. Natal and neonatal teeth: A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent , 2001; 19(3):110-112. 95. Rao RS, Mathad SV . Natal teeth: Case report and review of literature. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol , 2009; 13:41-46.
140 I. Markou et al. 96. Reynold JM, Gold MB, Scriver CR. The characterization of hereditary abnormalities of keratin: Clouston’s ectodermal dysplasia. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser , 1971; 7(8):91-95. 97. Roberts MW, Vann Jr WF, Jewson LG, Jacoway JR, Simon AR. Two natal maxillary molars: Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol , 1992; 73(5):543-545. 98. Roshan AS, Janaki C, Parveen B, GomathyIndian N . Rare association of hyper IgE syndrome with cervical rib and natal teeth. J Dermatol , 2009; 54(4):372-374. 99. Ruschel HC, Spiguel MH, Piccinini DD, Ferreira SH, Feldens EG. Natal primary molar: clinical and histological aspects. J Oral Sci, 2010; 52(2):313-317. 100. Rusmah M . Natal and neonatal teeth: A clinical and histological study. J Clin Pedia tr Dent , 1991; 15(4):251-253. 101. Sargent FC . Born to Die: Witchcraft and Infanticide in Bariba Culture. Ethnology, 1988; 27(1):79-95. 102. Seminario AL, Ivancaková R. Natal and neonatal teeth. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove), 2004; 47(4):229-233. 103. Shaw A, Longman C, Irving M, Splitt M . Neonatal teeth in X-linked Opitz (G/BBB) syndrome. Clin Dysmorphol , 2006; 15(3):185-186. 104. Sibert JR, Porteous JR. Erupted teeth in the newborn. 6 members in a family. Arch Dis Child , 1974; 49(6):492-493. 105. Sigal MJ, Mock D, Weinberg S . Bilateral mandibular hamartomas and familial natal teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol , 1988; 65(6):731-735. 106. Singh S, Subbareddy V, Dhananjaya G, Path R. Reactive fibrous hyperplasia associated with a natal tooth - A Case Report. J Indian Sot Pedo Prev Dent , 2004; 22(4):183-186. 107. Slayton RL. Treatment alternatives for sublingual traumatic ulceration (Riga-Fede disease). Pediatr Dent , 2000; 22(5):413-414. 108. Southam JC . Retained dentine papillae in the newborn. A clinical and histopathological study. Br Dent J , 1968; 125(12):534-538. 109. Southam JC . The structure of natal and neonatal teeth. Dent Pract Dent Rec, 1968; 18(12):423-427. 110. Spouge JD, Feasby WH . Erupted teeth in the newborn. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol , 1966; 22(2):198-208. 111. Štamfelj I, Jan J, Cvetko E, Gašperšič D . Size, ultrastructure, and microhardness of natal teeth with agenesis of permanent successors. Annals of Anatomy, 2010; 192(4):220-226. 112. Stanek J, De Courten-Myers G, Spaulding AG, Strub W, Hopkin RJ . Case of complex craniofacial anomalies, bilateral nasal proboscides, palatal pituitary, upper limbs reduction, and amnion rupture sequence: Disorganization phenotype? Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, 2001; 4(2):192-202.
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012 113. Strømme
Koppang H, Boman H, Hoel PS . Oral abnormalities in the Saldino-Noonan syndrome. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Histopathol , 1983; 398(3):247-262. 114. Taniai H, Chen H, Ursin S . Finlay-marks syndrome: Another
sporadic
case
and
additional
manifestations.
Pediatrics International , 2004; 46(3):353-355. 115. Tao Y-, Slavotinek AM, Vargervik K, Oberoi S . Hypodontia in Beare-Stevenson syndrome: An example of dental anomalies in FGFR-related craniosynostosis syndromes.
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal , 2010; 47(3):253-258. 116.Tay WM . Natal canine and molar in an infant. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol , 1970; 29(4):598-602. 117. To EW . A study of natal teeth in Hong Kong Chinese. Int J
Paediatr Dent , 1991; 1(2):73-76. 118. Tsubone H, Onishi T, Hayashibara T, Sobue S, Ooshima T . Clinico-pathological aspects of a residual natal tooth: A case report. J Oral Pathol Med , 2002; 31(4):239-241. 119. Turnpenny PD, De Silva DC, Gregory DW, Gray ES, Dean
JC . A four generation hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia family: an allelic variant of Clouston syndrome? Clin Dysmorphol , 1995; 4(4):324-333. 120. Uzamis M, Olmez S, Ozturk H, Celik H . Clinical and ultrastructural study of natal and neonatal teeth. J Clin
Pediatr Dent , 1999; 23(3):173-177. 121. Vergotine R, Hodgson B, Lambert L. Pulp polyp associated with a natal tooth: Case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent , 2009; 34(2):161-163. 122. Wolf N . Dental anomalies in neuropediatric disorders.
Medizinische Genetik , 2007; 19(4):414-417. 123. Zhu J, King D. Natal and neonatal teeth. ASDC J Dent Child , 1995; 62(2):123-128. 124. Ziai MN, Bock DJ, Da Silveira A, Daw JL . Natal teeth: A potential impediment to nasoalveolar molding in infants with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg , 2005; 16(2):262-266.
Correspondence and request for offprints to: Arhakis Aristidis Ermou 73 54623 Thessaloniki, Greece E-mail:
[email protected]
Y
T E I
C
BALKAN JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
O
S
L
A
C I
ISSN 1107 - 1141
G
O L
O
T A S T O M
The Maxillary Labial Fraenum A Controversy of Oral Surgeons vs. Orthodontists SUMMARY
The maxillary labial fraenum is a normal anatomic structure in the oral cavity, formed by mucous membrane and connective tissue. Although it is a normal structure, its presence has been associated with some unpleasant and even pathological situations. Specifically, a thick, hypertrophic or broad fibrous fraenum has been accused of causing a maxillary midline diastema, interfering with plaque removal, causing tension and gingival recession. A surgical removal of the fraenum is indicated in order to prevent these situations or facilitate orthodontic closure of the diastema. Frenectomy is the complete removal of the fraenum, including its attachment to the underlying bone. As shown in the literature there has been a controversy among researchers regarding the need of frenectomy and the time of the surgery. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the controversy of researchers regarding the removal of the maxillary labial fraenum, as a result of the study of the literature. Additionally, there has been an attempt to suggest the appropriate therapeutic strategy and indications for frenectomy, counting the medical experience and the patient’s needs. At the beginning of the study, it was important to cite the characteristics of normal and abnormal fraenum and consequences that presence of a pathological fraenum causes. Finally, there is a brief description of the most important surgical techniques for removal of the maxillary labial fraenum. Keywords: Maxillary Labial Fraenum; Frenectomy, controversy
Introduction The maxillary labial fraenum is a normal anatomic structure in the oral cavity, usually triangular in shape, extending from the maxillary midline area of the gingiva into the vestibule and mid-portion of the upper lip 16. It consists of epithelium, collagen fibres, blood vessels, nerves and sometimes few elements of minor salivary glands and isolated stratified muscle fibers 19,42. The fraenum is a dynamic and changeable structure, which tends to have variations in size, shape, and position of attachment during the different stages of growth and development 12. It is found to be smaller in length, thicker and more inferiorly attached in children 12,34. The eruption of primary incisors, the development of the maxillary sinus and vertical growth of the alveolar process make that insertion of the fraenum moves apically 28. In
Eva Lioliou, Apostolos Kostas, Lampros Zouloumis
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aristotle University, School of Dentistry, Thessaloniki, Greece
LITERATURE REVIEW (LR) Balk J Stom, 2012; 16:141-146
some of the cases a variation may lead to an “abnormal fraenum”; a fraenum which appears inordinately large or is attached especially close to the gingival margin 16. Henry et al25, in their histological study, concluded that there are also elastic fibres which extend sometimes to the whole length of the fraenum, even perforating the periosteum. Those authors considered that the harmful effect of the fraenum is due to the presence of the elastic and collagen fibres, while no evidence of substantial differences in composition of normal and abnormal fraena were identified. Miller characterized as “pathological” a fraenum which is uncommonly wide, when there is insufficient attached gingival zone in the midline, and when the interdental papilla moves by stretch of the fraenum35. An abnormal labial fraenum has been implicated in functional and aesthetic problems, such as a maxillary
142 Eva Lioliou et al.
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012
midline diastema. Regarding the maxillary midline 6. When a maxillary labial fraenum prevents the diastema, two ways were suggested in which the fraenum installation of a removable denture; may cause it. In the first way, the bulk of the fraenum 7. In rare occasions, for aesthetic reasons. fibres, retaining their embryological connection with the incisive papilla, will physically prevent approximation of central incisors2,15,22. Alternatively, these fibres will interrupt the fibres of the periodontal ligament between The Fraenum by the central incisors and produce a weak link in the chain Orthodontic Approach of fibres that join the teeth from one end of the arch to the other 1,5,13. The presence of the maxillary labial fraenum has a High fraenum insertion can lead to gingival recession great significance for the orthodontic community, since due to the tension which is applied on the tissues during it is considered to be the commonest causative factor for normal functions, such as speaking, chewing, and a maxillary midline diastema. An abnormal fraenum has laughing4,21,24,37,44. Moreover, a fraenum that encroaches also been accused of being a great danger for relapse after on the gingival margin and prevents the closure of space orthodontically treated diastema. Consequently, maxillary between the maxillary central incisors creates an area labial frenectomy was considered for many years as the for food impaction and difficulty in plaque removal 24,37. indicated treatment for maxillary midline diastema 9,14,34,37. The poor oral hygiene, due to difficulty in tooth brushing There has been a controversy even among results in inflammatory periodontal destruction 33. orthodontists concerning the need at all, and the timing Aesthetics could be affected as well in cases of a high for a frenectomy. Some orthodontists support a viewpoint smile line4,44. Finally, a big and high attached fraenum that there is a need for an early removal of the fraenum, could eliminate lip movement 4. so as to prevent any obstacles to complete diastema Over the years, the relationship between the closure. Other orthodontists propose to close the diastema maxillary midline diastema and the labial fraenum has first, and then carry out frenectomy in the hope that the been the subject of much controversy and confusion. resultant scar tissue will hold together the teeth in close In the 1939, Hirschfield advocated frenectomy as a apposition. A third body of clinicians rarely, if ever, mucogingival procedure to eliminate the aforementioned considers surgical removal of the fraenum. They prefer to pathologic situations caused by an abnormal fraenum attachment44. There is still a controversy among combat the undeniably increased relapse potential when a researchers concerning the need for it at all, as well as the diastema is closed, by using bonded retainers on the two central incisors 6,31,37. right time for frenectomy. Literature offers a great variety of opinions during Many orthodontists support the idea that even in years and it is obvious that they differ a lot concerning cases of an abnormal fraenum we should wait the eruption of all 6 permanent anterior teeth first. If the eruption of the etiology of a persisting diastema, such as to the all 6 permanent teeth has failed to close the diastema, possibility of promoting closure of a diastema by means 9 frenectomy has a clinical validity only in conjunction of frenectomy . At the beginning it was thought that the labial with orthodontic treatment 16,27. They also state that the relapse of orthodontically treated diastema caused by an fraenum interfered with the closure of the midline abnormal fraenum, which had not been excised, is a rare diastema. This belief resulted in misdiagnosis and 13,14. phenomenon3,5,16. On the other hand, surgeons accuse unnecessary surgical intervention of the fraenum Adams1 suggested that there is a specific type of fraenum a hyperplastic type of fraenum, usually with a fanlike which interrupts the continuity of interdental fibre, forms attachment, of causing a diastema and enhancing the possibilities of a relapse. A frenectomy could als o prevent the factor that inducts the reaction for the development the other unpleasant situations cited previously, such as of the diastema. Although, he stated that there is a need of presence of other causative factors. Campbell et al 11 gingival recession4,9,23,24,28,33,37. 43 There are some clinical situations in which a stated the same. Shashua and Artun found that there is a relationship between abnormal fraenum and the width maxillary labial frenectomy is indicated 4,24,37,49: of the maxillary midline diastema. Edwards 16 supported 1. To avoid a relapse of an orthodontically treated the presence of a strong but not absolute correlation maxillary diastema; 2. In cases with a too short labial fraenum, which creates between the fraenum and the upper midline diastema. Gardiner 18 made a survey of 1000 children 5-15 years old. problems in upper lip movement, speech etc; 80% of the cases with midline diastema were associated 3. To avoid gingival recession due to tension created with a prominent fraenum. He took this finding as an during the normal oral function; evidence to support the opinion that the fraenum is often a 4. To facilitate lip lengthening procedure; contributory cause of midline diastema. Angle 2 concluded 5. To allow effective tooth brushing in the area of the fraenum; that the presence of an abnormal fraenum is a cause for
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012
The Maxillary Labial Fraenum 143
midline diastema. James 29 used a sample of 10 girls 12-22 In case of a diastema, a hyperplastic type of fraenum, years old with medial diastema. A year after frenectomy, with a fanlike attachment, can inhibit the closure of the a reduction was noted in 8 cases. He assumed that diastema or even lead to a relapse of an orthodontically frenectomy leads to a reduction of the diastema. By the corrected diastema. Studies reveal that a midline diastema time researchers rejected this statement and proved that has closed earlier in operated cases. Thus, the result there is no evidence to establish a relationship between the implies that frenectomy is indicated, if early closure of the different types of fraenum and diastema. diastema is considered desirable, especially if patient finds 46 Tait stated that the fraenum has no effect to the it very unsightly9. maxillary central incisors. Ceremelo 12 concluded that The advantage of an early excision prior to the fraenum is not related to the presence or the width orthodontic treatment is the ease of surgical access 33,37. of the diastema. Bergstorm et al 9 stated that the long Access to the surgical procedure is more limited after term potential for spontaneous diastema closure, in orthodontic closure and it will not be possible to remove patients with abnormal fraenum, has no difference even all the residual fibrous tissue thoroughly from the if there has been a frenectomy, or not. Popovich et al 40,41 interdental suture area 37. suggested that the presence of the diastema leads to the In guides of paediatric, oral surgery treatment is abnormal fraenum, and not the adverse. suggested when attachment exerts a traumatic force on the Since there is no quite evidence concerning the fact gingiva, causing the papilla to blanch when the upper lip that the maxillary labial fraenum is the main causative is pulled, or if it causes a diastema to remain after eruption factor for a midline diastema, some orthodontists propose of permanent canines 23. the following therapeutic methodology 37,45: Initially, it Interference with oral hygiene measures, aesthetics is necessary for the dentist to make a diagnostic trial, in and psychological reasons are contributing factors that order to find out whether the fraenum is implicated in the relate the treatment of the maxillary fraenum 23. pathogenecity of the diastema. Also, elimination of the maxillary labial fraenum is 1. Positive “blanch test” of the incisal papilla, when often indicated in edentulous or partial edentulous patients pulling the lips forward. By pulling the upper lip and to allow denture flange extension in this area 49. exerting pressure on the fraenum, if there is a blanching, (ischemia in the papilla) it is safe to predict that the fraenum will unfavourably influence the development of The Fraenum by the anterior occlusion; 2. With the use of a periapical radiograph, in the Periodontal Approach area of central incisors we can discover: a presence of a mesiodens, an odontoma in the middle line; a presence The labial frenectomy must be examined by the of residual suture of alveolar bone. If we find out that the aspect of periodontists as well. In 1950, Friedman was diastema in our case is related to the fraenum, a maxillary the first to introduce the term “mucogingival surgery”, labial frenectomy is indicated. in order to describe techniques that aim to preserve the It is important to emphasize on the fact that attached gingiva, remove aberrant fraenum or muscle frenectomy has clinical validity only after the eruption attachment and increase the depth of the vestibule 36. of all 6 permanent teeth if it failed to close the diastema, For years, clinicians targeted in removing the fraenum and then only in conjunction with orthodontic treatment. or deepening the vestibule 17; today, it is approved that So after the eruption of all 6 permanent teeth, orthodontic the presence of an adequate zone of attached gingiva appliances are used to close the diastema. A frenectomy is the basic factor. When there is an adequate zone of is carried out, so as the scar tissue will hold the teeth attached gingiva, even a high fraenum attachment does together 16,20,27,33,37,39,48. not constitute dangerous factor for the beginning and the During the primary dentition phase, surgical process of periodontal disease. On the other hand, in the intervention of the labial fraenum is not recommended 7. case of inadequate zone of the attached gingiva, the draw of the fraenum and muscle attachment cannot be balanced, there is inability of good and atraumatic oral hygiene, and this is a fact that usually leads to gingival recession 32,36. The Fraenum by Consequently, there exist anatomic (not adequate zone of attached gingiva), biologic (inflammation, inability for Oral Surgery Approach good oral hygiene) and functional (inability for protection Oral surgeons accused an abnormal fraenum of during chewing procedure) factors that lead to the causing unpleasant situations, such as maxillary midline decision of frenectomy 32. The maxillary labial fraenum diastema and consequently suggested the operation of may present the aesthetic problem as well, compromise an maxillary labial frenectomy 20,36. orthodontic result or create traumatic problems in tissues
144 Eva Lioliou et al.
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012
during oral hygiene actions. These situations also need and periosteum exposed 3. After that, some modifications surgical intervention 32. include the addition of horizontal relaxing incisions and The initial approach was to remove the fraenum the mucogingival junction, and the lateral underlying with simultaneous deepening of the vestibule. Later, this of the labial attached gingiva adjacent to the excision technique was replaced by plastic surgery, which aimed area. Disagreements have been expressed because of to cover the root of the tooth. Another technique was a the increased possibility for creating hematoma and frenectomy with a gingival augmentation procedure, using concerning the need for a dressing over the wound 16. a pedicle graft 36. Another procedure that was described called “the Edwards16 used a sample of 308 patients, who prior z-plasty technique”. In this technique, the fraenum is to orthodontic treatment demonstrated either diastema not removed but it is intended to relax the pull of the an abnormal fraenum or a combination of both. In his fraenum on the interdental soft tissue 16,20. By the aspect of technique he noticed the aesthetic maintenance of the periodontists, there has been described a frenotomy with interdental papilla between the central incisors. Miller no excision of the marginal papilla, and “the curtain type” chose a surgical technique in which he avoided removal of of gingivotomy of the palatal tissue behind 4 incisors the entire fraenum, but emphasized in orthodontic stability (Frisch, Jones, Bhaskar)16. Other clinicians combined the without aesthetic sacrifice. His technique seemed to be classic frenectomy with a lateral pedicle graft, free papilla similar, but Edwards thought that the transeptal fibres of graft and free gingival graft taken from the papilla 4,20. A the fraenum should be destroyed, whereas Miller made lateral pedicle graft does not offer a complete coverage no effort to destroy transeptal fibres 35,36. Regarding the of the wound and has aesthetic problems creating an interdental papilla, it proved that it should be maintained, unsatisfactory colour match 4. A technique known as even though clinically it may appear to be a part of the “Archer incision” is a simple frenectomy that is made 36 labial fraenum . with a V-shaped incision 3. The disadvantage of this Periodontists do not tend to use the classical technique is that it leaves a longitudinal surgical incision frenectomy, in which interdental tissue and palatine and scarring, which may lead to periodontal problems and papilla are completely excised. Today, we use frenectomy an non-aesthetic appearance 4. in which we have a partial removal of the fraenum and Recently a new frenectomy technique has been relocate it to a more apically position. This technique proposed by Bagga et al 4, which provides a good aesthetic leads to an acceptable solution of the problem and to the result. In this technique, a V-shaped full-thickness incision 16,44 movement of the fraenum more apically . was placed at the gingival base of the fraenum attachment. In case of a diastema, the ideal time for this After the excision of a fraenum, a V-shaped defect on the technique is after the beginning of orthodontic treatment gingiva side has remained. An oblique partial thickness and about 6 weeks before the appliances are removed. incision is placed on adjacent attached gingiva extending That allows healing, tissue maturation and does not beyond the mucogingival junction. A partial-thickness prolong orthodontic treatment36. dissection of the attached gingiva is formed in an apicocoronal direction. Then we have a triangular pedicle of the attached gingiva with free apex and the base continuous with the alveolar mucosa. Finally, a bilateral triangular pedicle is sutured at the centre, covering the underlying Surgical Techniques defect4. Various surgical techniques have been described for the management of the abnormal upper labial fraenum8,20,30. It is important to refer that there is a distraction between the terms “frenectomy” and Discussion “frenotomy”. Frenectomy is the complete removal of the fraenum including its attachment to underlying bone; The study of the literature reveals that the presence frenotomy is the partial removal of the fraenum and is of the maxillary labial fraenum has been associated used extensively for periodontal purposes to relocate the with many pathological situations in the oral cavity; fraenum attachment, so as to create an increased zone of the most common of them is the maxillary midline the attached gingiva between the gingival margin and the diastema. Consequently, for decades there has been a fraenum16,24,37. tendency from every part of the dental community, to 2 main ways for the removal of the fraenum are remove the fraenum at an early age in order to achieve the conventional technique with scalpels or periodontal the diastema closure. 13 Many researchers dealt with this knives and the technique with the use of soft tissue issue and many research papers have been published. laser 24,47. Archer described the classic frenectomy The therapeutic approach gradually changed into a more technique in which the fraenum, interdental tissues and conservative management and a controversy among palatine papilla are completely excised, leaving bone researchers started, existing until nowadays.
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012 In the orthodontic community there is unanimity on this issue37. Orthodontists support that the fraenum should be maintained until the age of the eruption of all 6 permanent anterior teeth. After that, and only if the diastema remains the same, a frenectomy is indicated, with subsequent orthodontic closure of the diastema 9,16. Periodontists concentrate on the issue of the adequate zone of the attached gingiva. In case of inadequate zone of the attached gingiva, the increased tension causes gingival recession and a frenectomy is recommended 24,32,36. Oral surgeons suggest that in case of a maxillary midline diastema, a small intervention of the fraenum is useful. In this way, the closure of the diastema is facilitated and the orthodontic treatment is not affected 9,20. In cases that the fraenum causes problems in periodontal tissues, such as gingival recession, the removal of the fraenum should be direct 24,44. Moreover, it is quite clear that when the presence of the maxillary labial fraenum interrupts the installation of a removable denture, the removal of the fraenum is imperative49. Today, the belief that the presence of a maxillary midline diastema does not prompt an early frenectomy predominates. We must wait for a short period, specifically until the eruption of all 6 permanent anterior teeth9,14,16,20,34,36,37. Yet, this is acceptable if the fraenum is not responsible for other pathological situations in the oral cavity. On the other hand, it is important to remember that the final decision is taken by patients. The duration and the cost of the treatment are 2 basic factors. Patients rarely compromise with expensive and long-term procedures, especially if these include orthodontic treatment which affects aesthetics8,9.
References 8. Adams CP . The relation of spacing of the upper central incisors to abnormal labial fraenum and other features of the dento-facial complex. Dent Prac Dent Rec, 1954; 74:72-86. 9. Angle EH . Malocclusion of the teeth. 7 th ed. Philadelphia: White dental manufacturing, 1907. 10. Archer WH . Oral surgery for dental prosthesis. In: Archer WH (Ed). Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1975; pp 135-210. 11. Bagga S, Bhat KM, Bhat GS, Thomas BS . Esthetic management of the upper labial fraenum: a novel frenectomy technique. Quintessence, 2006; 37:819-823. 12. Baum AT . The midline diastema. J Oral Med , 1966; 21:3039. 13. Beasley WK, Maskeroni AJ, Moon MG, Keating GV, Maxwell AW . The orthodontic and restorative treatment of a large diastema: a case report. Gen Dent , 2004; 52:37-41. 14. Bedell WR. Nonsurgical reduction of the labial fraenum with and without orthodontic treatment. J Am Dent Assoc , 1951; 42:510-515.
The Maxillary Labial Fraenum 145 15. Bell WH . Surgical-orthodontic treatment of interincisal diastemas. Am J Orthod , 1970; 57:158-163. 16. Bergstrom K, Jensen R, Martensson B. The effect of superior labial frenectomy in cases with midline diastema. Am J Orthod , 1973; 63:633-638. 17. Campbell A, Kindelan J . Maxillary midline diastema: a case report involving a combined orthodontic/maxillofacial approach. J Orthod , 2006; 33; 22-27. 18. Campbell PM, Moore JW, Matthews JL. Orthodontically corrected midline diastemas. A histologic study and surgical procedure. Am J Orthod , 1975; 67:139-158. 19. Ceremello PJ . The superior labial fraenum and the midline diastema and their relation to growth and development of the oral structures. Am J Orthod , 1953; 39:120-139. 20. Dewel BF . The labial fraenum, midline diastema, and palatine papilla: a clinical analysis. Dent Clin North Am, 1966; pp 175-184. 21. Diaz-Pizan ME, Lagravere MO, Villena R. Midline diastema and fraenum morphology in the primary dentition. Journal of dentistry for children, 2006; 73:11-14. 22. Dickson GC . Orthodontics in general dental practice. London: Pitman, 1964. 23. Edwards JG. The diastema, the fraenum, the frenectomy: A clinical study. Am J Orthod , 1977; 71:489-508. 24. Friedman N . Mucogingival surgery. Texas Dent J , 1957; 75. 25. Gardiner JH . Midline spaces. Dent Prac Dent Rec, 1967; 17:287-298. 26. Gartner LP, Schein D. The superior labial fraenum: a histologic observation. Quintessence Int , 1991; 22:443-445. 27. Gkantidis N, Topouzelis N, Zouloumis L . Differential diagnosis and combined treatment of maxillary midline diastema caused by the fraenum and/or intermaxillary suture. Balk J Stom, 2008; 12:81-88. 28. Gottsegen R. Fraenum position and vestibule depth in relation to gingival health. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol , 1954; 7:1069-1078. 29. Graber TM . Orthodontics: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1972. 30. Guideline on Pediatric Oral Surgery, American Academy of Pediatric Surgery (AAPD). 2010; p 8. 31. Haytac MC, Ozcelik O. Evaluation of patient perceptions after frenectomy operations: a comparison of carbon dioxide laser and scalpel techniques. J Periodontol , 2006; 77:18151819. Henry SW, Levin MP, Tsaknis PJ . Histologic features of the 32. superior labial fraenum. J Periodontol , 1976; 47:25-28. Herremans EL. Anterior diastema: frenectomy. Dent Surv, 33. 1971; 47:33-37. 34. Huang SW, Creath CJ . The midline diastema: a review of its etiology and treatment. Pediatr Dent , 1995; 17:171-179. 35. Jacobs MH . The abnormal fraenum labii. Dent Cosmos, 1932; 74:436-439. 36. James GA. Clinical implication of a follow-up study after frenectomy. Dent Pract , 1967; 17:299-305. 37. Kahnberg KE . Fraenum surgery. A comparison of three surgical methods. Int J Oral Surg , 1977; 6:328-333. 38. Kinderknecht KE, Kupp LI . Aesthetic solution for large maxillary anterior diastemas and fraenum attachment. Prac Periodontics Aesthet Dent , 1996; 8:95-102. 39. Konstantinidis A. Periodontology. Vol 1.Thessaloniki: Konstantinidis A, 2003; p 77.
146 Eva Lioliou et al. 40. Koora K, Muthu MS, Rathna PV . Spontaneous closure of midline diastema following frenectomy. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent , 2007; 25:23-26. 41. Lindsey D. The upper mid-line space and its relation to the labial fraenum in children and in adults. A statistical evaluation. Br Dent J , 1977; 143:327-332. 42. Miller PD Jr . The frenectomy combined with a laterally positioned pedicle graft. Functional and esthetic considerations. J Periodontol , 1985; 56:102-106. 43. Miller PD Jr . Regenerative and reconstructive periodontal plastic surgery. Dent Clin North Am, 1988; 32:287-305. 44. Mittal M . Maxillary labial fraenectomy: indications and technique. Dent Update, 2011; 38:159-162. 45. Munshi A, Munshi AK . Midline space closure in the mixed dentition: A case report. J Indian Soc Pedo Prev Dent , 2001; 19:57-60. 46. Oesterele LJ, Shellhart WC . Maxillary midline diastema: a look at the causes. J Am Dent Assoc, 1999; 130:85-94. 47. Popovich F, Thompson GW, Main PA. The maxillary interincisal diastema and its relationship to the superior labial fraenum and intermaxillary suture. Angle Orthod , 1977; 47:265-271. 48. Popovich F, Thompson GW, Main PA. Persisting maxillary diastema: differential diagnosis and treatment. Dent J , 1977; 43:330-333. 49. Ross RO, Brown FH, Houston GD . Histologic survey of the frena of the oral cavity. Quintessence Int , 1990; 21:233-237.
Balk J Stom, Vol 16, 2012 50. Shashua D, Artun J . Relapse after orthodontic correction of maxillary median diastema: a follow-up evaluation of consecutive cases. Angle Orthod , 1999; 69:257-263. 51. Sorrentino JM, Tarnow DP . The semilunar coronally repositioned flap combined with a frenectomy to obtain root coverage over the maxillary central incisors. J Periodontol , 2009; 80:1013-1017. 52. Spiropoulou MN . Basic Principles of Orthodontic. Vol 2. 2006; pp 250-251. 53. Tait CW . The median fraenum of the upper lip and its influence on the spacing of the upper central incisor teeth. Dent Cosmos, 1924; 76:991-992. 54. Takei HH, Azzi RA. Periodontal plastic and esthetic surgery. In: Newman MG, Takei HH, Carranza FA (Eds). Carranza’s clinical periodontology. London: WB Saunders, 2002; pp 870-871. 55. Taylor JE .Clinical observations relating to the normal and abnormal fraenum labii superiors. Am J Orthod , 1939; 25:646-660. 56. Terry BC, Hillenbrand DG. Minor preprosthetic surgical procedures. Dent Clin North Am, 1994; 38(2):193-216. Correspondence and request for offprints to: Prof. Lampros Zouloumis Ippodromiou Sq 17 54621, Thessaloniki,Greece E-mail:
[email protected]
Y
T E I
C
BALKAN JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
ISSN 1107 - 1141
O
S
L
A
C I
G
O L
O
T A S T O M
Association between Condylar Position and Tilt of Frontal Occlusal Plane in Patients with Transversal and Vertical Dentofacial Discrepancy SUMMARY
Asymmetric malocclusion is a common problem in children with transverse and vertical dental anomalies. These asymmetries can be skeletal, dental, functional or combination of these. The aim of this study was to determine condylar position and quantifying inclination of frontal occlusal plane in patients with transversal and vertical dentofacial discrepancy. The study group consisted of 80 patients, 40 had unilateral posterior cross-bite, and 40 had normal occlusion. The age of the patients ranged between 13 and 18 years. In addition to transversal and vertical clinical observation, Ricketts facial PA cephalometric analysis was made. Radiographic analysis showed the relationship between the cant of the occlusal plane and mandibular position. The obtained results showed that there was a very high statistical significance (p