Penetrating Chest Trauma.pdf | Major Trauma | Thorax
Short Description
Penetrating Chest Trauma Author: Rohit Shahani, MD, MS, MCh; Chief Editor: Jeffrey C Milliken, MD more... Updated: Oct 3...
Description
01/11/12
Penetrating Chest Trauma Go
Medscape Reference Reference
News Reference Education MEDLINE
Penetrating Chest Trauma Author: Rohit Shahani, MD, MS, MCh; Chief Editor: Jeffrey C Milliken, MD more... Updated: Oct 3, 2012
Background
Thoracic injuries account for 20-25% of deaths due to trauma and contribute to 25-50% of the remaining deaths. Approximately 16,000 deaths per year in the United States alone are attributable to ches injuries are a contributing factor in up to 75% of all trauma-related deaths. The increased prevalence of penetrating chest injury (associated with the "drug war" in the United States) and improved prehosp resulted in an increasing number of critically injured but potentially salvageable patients presenting to trauma centers. Recently, the classic "trimodal" temporal distribution of trauma deaths has been qu been widely taught in the design of trauma systems.[2] For more information, visit Medscape’s Trauma Resource Center.
History of the Procedure
One of the earliest writings of thoracic injury was noted in the Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, written in 3000 BCE. Galen reported attempts to treat gladiators with chest injuries with open packing. In 16 described operative removal of an arrowhead from the chest wall of a Native American. In 1814, Larrey (Napoleon's military surgeon) reported various injuries to the subclavian vessels. Rehn performed th cardiorrhaphy in Germany in 1896. Hill performed the first cardiorrhaphy in the United States in 1902 and initiated the modern treatment of the wounded heart.
Penetrating trauma to the thoracic vessels was not extensively reported until the 20th century because of the absence of survivors. In 1934, Alfred Blalock was the first American surgeon to successfully Guidelines for treating thoracic trauma were not established until World War II.
Additional experience in the treatment of penetrating trauma to the thorax was gained in later military experiences, including the conflicts in Korea and Vietnam, and, to a lesser degree, in US actions in Somalia, and the Persian Gulf. Other large international experiences have derived from the Falkland Island conflict, various Middle Eastern engagements, and multiple conflicts in the African states.
Significant experience has also been gained from large US metropolitan areas as a result of assaults involving firearms and handheld weapons and impalements resulting from falls or leaps from elevation Tex; Los Angeles, Calif; Atlanta, Ga; Detroit, Mich; and Denver, Colo, have been particularly productive in their treatments of thoracic penetrating trauma. The number of trauma patients in these large m in the 1970s and 1980s that the military sent its medical personnel to train caregivers at these centers.[3, 4]
With the advancement of wartime medical care and access to The Joint Theater Trauma Registry (JTTR), thoracic injury patterns have changed dramatically. As a result of advances in body armor and th medical care at the battlefield, mortal thoracic wounds seem to have decreased, allowing patients who would have previously died to live long enough to receive treatment.[5]
Problem
Any entry wound below the nipples (front) and the inferior scapular angles (dorsum) should be considered an entry point for a course that may have carried the missile into the abdominal cavity. Missiles can penetrate all body regions regardless of the point of entry. Any patient with a gunshot entry wound for which a corresponding exit wound cannot be identified should be considered to have a retained to the central or distal vasculature. A patient with combined intrathoracic and intra-abdominal wounds has a markedly greater chance of dying. For information on treating penetrating abdominal wounds, see the article Abdominal Stab Wound Exploration.
Etiology Mechanism of injury
The mechanism of injury may be categorized as low, medium, or high velocity. Low-velocity injuries include impalement (eg, knife wounds), which disrupts only the structures penetrated. Medium-velocit from most types of handguns and air-powered pellet guns and are characterized by much less primary tissue destruction than wounds caused by high-velocity forces. High-velocity injuries include bullet wounds resulting from military weapons. Shotgun injuries, despite being caused by medium-velocity projectiles, are sometimes included within management discussions for high-velocity projectile injuries. This inclusion is reasonable because to the surrounding tissue and subsequent cavitation, as described by the following equation in which KE is kinetic energy, M is mass, and V is velocity: KE = ½ MV2
The 3 major subcategories of ballistics are internal, external, and terminal. Internal ballistics describe the characteristics of the projectile within the gun barrel. External ballistics examines the factors tha path to the target, including wind resistance and gravity. Terminal ballistics evaluates the projectile as it strikes its target.
The amount of tissue damage is directly related to the amount of energy exchange between the penetrating object and the body part. The density of the tissue involved and the frontal area of the penetra factors determining the rate of energy loss.
The energy exchange produces a permanent cavity inside the tissue. Part of this cavity is a result of the crushing of the tissue as the projectile passes through. The expansion of the tissue particles awa creates a temporary cavity. Because this cavity is temporary, one must realize that it was once present in order to understand the full extent of injury.
Penetrations from blast fragments or from fragmentation weapons can be particularly destructive because of their extremely high velocities. Weapons designed specifically for antipersonnel effects (eg, m fragments with initial velocities of 4500 ft/s, a far greater speed than even most rifle bullets. The tremendous energy imparted to tissue from fragments with such velocity causes extensive disruptive and Weaponry of the 21st century consists mostly of improvised explosive devices (IEDs). These devices are homemade bombs and they create a deadly triad of penetrating, blast, and burn wounds. Of the the current Global War on Terror, 40% is penetrating chest trauma.
Pathophysiology emedicine.medscape.com/article/425698-overview
1/5
01/11/12
Penetrating Chest Trauma
As noted by Inci and colleagues in a 1998 study of 755 patients with thoracic injuries, penetrating chest trauma (PCT) comprises a broad spectrum of injuries and severity.[6] The injuries and number of p listed as follows:[6] Hemothorax - 190 Hemopneumothorax - 184 Pneumothorax - 144 Diaphragmatic rupture - 121 Open hemopneumothorax - 95 Pulmonary contusion - 50 Open pneumothorax - 24 Rib fracture Fewer than 2 fractures - 16 More than 2 fractures - 13 Subcutaneous emphysema - 14 Bilateral pneumothorax - 9 Open bilateral hemopneumothorax - 13 Pneumomediastinum - 6 Thoracic wall lacerations - 4 Bilateral hemopneumothorax - 3 Open bilateral pneumothorax - 3 Sternal fracture - 3 Bilateral diaphragmatic rupture - 2
The clinical consequences depend on the mechanism of the injury, the location of the injury, associated injuries, and underlying illnesses. Organs at risk, in addition to the intrathoracic contents, include retroperitoneal space, and the neck.
Presentation Initial management
As always in trauma, management begins with establishing ABCs. Indications for emergency endotracheal intubation include apnea, profound shock, and inadequate ventilation. Chest radiography is no clinical signs of a tension pneumothorax, and immediate chest decompression is accomplished with either a large-bore needle at the second intercostal space or, more definitively, with a tube thoracost must be appropriately covered to permit adequate ventilation and to prevent the iatrogenic development of a tension pneumothorax.
Damage control operation appears to be the new mantra in the advanced care of penetrating thoracic trauma. Damage control requires modification of the ABCs of trauma, in that resuscitative and diagn simultaneously in the immediate time after the unstable patient's presentation. Quickly and solely controlling hemorrhage and contamination to expedite reestablishing a survivable physiology is the ess Additionally, aggressive correction of the acidosis, coagulopathy, and hypothermia occurs in the ICU.[7]
Volume replenishment is the cornerstone of treating hemorrhagic shock but can also cause significant compromise of other organ systems. Continuous infusions of even blood or normotonic fluids caus edema, frank acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or a tremendous increase in lung water ("soggy lungs"), and cardiac compromise. Newer approaches, described in both military and civilian lite of hypertonic solutions in an effort to minimize these complications. Alternatively, several groups have championed the concept of "scoop and run" when treating injuries in the field.[8] With the development of modern (civilian) emergency medical services, the field care of Rapid assessment to identify life-threatening injuries along with key interventions, namely management of the airway and control of hemorrhage, and avoidance of massive volume increases before rapid appropriate facility is the current standard of care. This is in contrast to the concept of "stay and play," during which trained personnel make major triage and treatment decisions in the field.
If the patient has persistently low systemic pressure, a source of ongoing blood loss or some other mechanisms to explain the hypotension (eg, cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax) should be pr some data suggest that continued volume resuscitation before surgical control of bleeding may worsen both the bleeding process and final outcome. Fluid collections in either hemothorax should be treated with percutaneous thoracostomy tubes. See the image below and the article Hemothorax.
Upright posteroanterior chest rediograph of patient w ith right-sided hemothorax.
Indications Thoracotomy Thoracotomy may be indicated for acute or chronic conditions. Acute indications include the following: Cardiac tamponade Acute hemodynamic deterioration/cardiac arrest in the trauma center Penetrating truncal trauma (resuscitative thoracotomy) Vascular injury at the thoracic outlet Loss of chest wall substance (traumatic thoracotomy) Massive air leak Endoscopic or radiographic evidence of significant tracheal or bronchial injury Endoscopic or radiographic evidence of esophageal injury Radiographic evidence of great vessel injury Mediastinal passage of a penetrating object Significant missile embolism to the heart or pulmonary artery Transcardiac placement of an inferior vena caval shunt for hepatic vascular wounds
Patients who arrive in cardiac arrest or who arrest shortly after arrival may be candidates for emergency resuscitative thoracotomy. A right chest tube must be placed simultaneously. The use of emerge has been reported to result in survival rates of 9-57% for patients with penetrating cardiac injuries and survival rates of 0-66% for patients with noncardiac thoracic injuries, but overall survival rates are app The proportion of patients with PCT who can be treated without operation has been reported to vary from 29-94%.[9] Chronic indications for thoracotomy include the following: Nonevacuated clotted hemothorax Chronic traumatic diaphragmatic hernia Traumatic cardiac septal or valvular lesion
emedicine.medscape.com/article/425698-overview
2/5
01/11/12
Penetrating Chest Trauma Chronic traumatic thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm Nonclosing thoracic duct fistula Chronic (or neglected) posttraumatic empyema Infected intrapulmonary hematoma (eg, traumatic lung abscess) Missed tracheal or bronchial injury Tracheoesophageal fistula Innominate artery/tracheal fistula Traumatic arterial/venous fistula
Another indication for acute thoracostomy is often based on chest tube output. Immediate evacuation of 1500 mL of blood is a sufficient indication; however, the trend in output is more important. If bleed of more than 250 mL/h, thoracotomy is probably indicated.
Thoracoscopy
The role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the management of penetrating chest trauma is expanding rapidly. Initially promoted for the management of retained hemothoraces and the diagnosis and thoracic surgeons are now using thoracoscopy for treatment of chest wall bleeding, diagnosis of transmediastinal injuries, pericardial window, and persistent pneumothoraces.[10] The major contraind thoracoscopic surgery is hemodynamic instability.
Relevant Anatomy
The anatomy of the thoracic cage is well-known and encompasses the area beneath the clavicles and superior to the diaphragm, bound laterally by the rib cage, anteriorly by the sternum and ribs, and p bodies. Entry into the thorax may be made by sternotomy; thoracotomy (incising between selected ribs, most commonly the fourth and fifth) on either the right or left side; or a clamshell incision, consis incisions traversing the sternum to join the two. Additional modifications of each of these approaches are not discussed in detail here. Particular care must be exercised laterally near the sternum, where the internal thoracic (mammary) artery lies 2-4 cm on either side. Similarly, remember that immediately inferior to each rib body are t nerve, from which voluminous bleeding can occur. Patients have required reexploration for injuries to these various vessels and have exsanguinated as a result of missed injuries to these vessels.
Anteriorly, injuries to the heart should be presumed to have occurred if entry points are present anywhere between the 2 midclavicular lines. On occasion, significant injury to the heart has occurred from margins, as in gunshot or missile injuries.
Exceptionally long penetrating instruments and weapons (eg, arrows, swords, lances) can also directly penetrate the heart from a distant entry point. Similarly, injuries to any of the intrathoracic structur penetrating devices; consider the possibility of injuries to the diaphragm, great vessels, or posterior mediastinal structures in these cases. The right atrium and right ventricle are the anterior portions of the heart; these areas are the primary sites involved in penetrating injuries of the heart.
Contraindications Contraindications to various explorations and techniques are discussed in their respective sections.
Contributor Information and Disclosures Author Rohit Shahani, MD, MS, MCh Consulting Staff, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Health Quest Medical Practice and Vassar Brothers Medical Center
Rohit Shahani, MD, MS, MCh is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and Society of Thoracic Su Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Coauthor(s) Jan David Galla, MD, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center Jan David Galla, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Aerospace Medical Association, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Cardiology American Heart Association, American Medical Association, Civil Aviation Medical Association, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Specialty Editor Board Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment Daniel S Schwartz, MD, FACS Assistant Clinical Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Chief of Thoracic Surgery, Huntington Hospital
Daniel S Schwartz, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Western Thora Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Paolo Zamboni, MD Professor of Surgery, Chief of Day Surgery Unit, Chair of Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, Italy Paolo Zamboni, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Venous Forum and New York Academy of Sciences Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Chief Editor
Jeffrey C Milliken, MD Chief, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California at Irvine Medical Center; Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, School of Med
Jeffrey C Milliken, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Phys Surgeons, American Heart Association, American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, California Medical Association, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Phi Beta Kappa Southwest Oncology Group, and Western Surgical Association Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
References 1. LoCicero J 3rd, Mattox KL. Epidemiology of chest trauma. Surg Clin North Am. Feb 1989;69(1):15-9. [Medline]. 2. Demetriades D, Kimbrell B, Salim A, Velmahos G, Rhee P, Preston C, et al. Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system: is "trimodal" distribution a valid concept?. J Am Coll Surg Text]. 3. Knuth TE, Wilson A, Oswald SG. Military training at civilian trauma centers: the first year's experience with the Regional Trauma Network. Mil Med. Sep 1998;163(9):608-14. [Medline].
emedicine.medscape.com/article/425698-overview
3/5
01/11/12
Penetrating Chest Trauma 4. Schreiber MA, Holcomb JB, Conaway CW, et al. Military trauma training performed in a civilian trauma center. J Surg Res. May 1 2002;104(1):8-14. [Medline]. 5. Capt Brandon W. Popper, MD, USAF MC, Capt Shaun M. Gifford, MD, USAF MC, et al. Wartime Thoraci Injury: Perspectives in Modern Warfare. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1032-6. [Medline] 6. Inci I, Ozcelik C, Tacyildiz I, et al. Penetrating chest injuries: unusually high incidence of high-velocity gunshot wounds in civilian practice. World J Surg. May 1998;22(5):438-42. [Medline]
7. Herb A Phelan, MD, Sharla Gayle Patterson, MD, Moustaffa O Hassan, MD, et al. Thoracic Damage-Control Operation: Principles, Techniques, and Definitive Repair. J Am Coll Surg. Dec 2006;2
8. Guillermo Parra Sanchez, Edward W.K. Peng, Richard Marks, Pradip K. Sarkar. 'Sccop and Run' strategy for a resuscitative sternotomy following unstable penetrating chest injury. Interactive Ca Surgery. 2010;10:467-469. [Medline]. 9. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Harken AH. Emergency Department Thoracotomy. In: Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, eds. Trauma. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000:245-58. 10. Casós SR, Richardson JD. Role of thoracoscopy in acute management of chest injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. Dec 2006;12(6):584-9. [Medline]. 11. Mirvis SE. Imaging of acute thoracic injury: the advent of MDCT screening. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. Oct 2005;26(5):305-31. [Medline].
12. Magnotti LJ, Weinberg JA, Schroeppel TJ, et al. Initial chest CT obviates the need for repeat chest radiograph after penetrating thoracic trauma. Am Surg. Jun 2007;73(6):569-72; discussion 572-3 13. Eric K. Hoffer. Endovascular intervention in thoracic arterial trauma. Injury. 2008;39:1257-1274. 14. Mandavia DP, Joseph A. Bedside echocardiography in chest trauma. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Aug 2004;22(3):601-19. [Medline]. 15. Etoch SW, Bar-Natan MF, Miller FB, et al. Tube thoracostomy. Factors related to complications. Arch Surg. May 1995;130(5):521-5; discussion 525-6. [Medline].
16. Dake MD, White RA, Diethrich EB, et al. Report on endograft management of traumatic thoracic aortic transections at 30 days and 1 year from a multidisciplinary subcommittee of the Society fo Committee. J Vasc Surg. Apr 2011;53(4):1091-6. [Medline]. 17. Carr J, Buterakos R, Bowling W, Janson L, Kralovich K, Copeland C, et al. Long-Term Functional and Echocardiographic Assessment After Penetrating Cardiac Injury: 5-Year Follow-Up Results. 2011;70(3):701-704. 18. Brown J, Grover FL. Trauma to the heart. Chest Surg Clin N Am. May 1997;7(2):325-41. [Medline].
19. Reed RL. Lung Infections and Trauma. In: Norton JA, Bollinger RR, Chang AE, Lowry SF, Mulvihill SJ, Pass HI, Thompson RW, eds. Surgery: Basic Science and Clinical Evidence. New York, NY 20. Wall MJ Jr, Mattox KL, Chen CD, Baldwin JC. Acute management of complex cardiac injuries. J Trauma. May 1997;42(5):905-12. [Medline].
21. Hopson LR, Hirsh E, Delgado J, et al. Guidelines for withholding or termination of resuscitation in prehospital traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: joint position statement of the national association american college of surgeons committee on trauma. J Am Coll Surg. Jan 2003;196(1):106-12. [Medline]. 22. Serdar Onat, Refik Ulku, Alper Avci, Gungor Ates, Cemal Ozcelik. Urgent thoracotomy for penetrating chest trauma: Analysis of 158 patients of single center. Injury. 2010;In press:[Medline] 23. Ammons MA, Moore EE, Rosen P. Role of the observation unit in the management of thoracic trauma. J Emerg Med. 1986;4(4):279-82. [Medline]. 24. Asensio JA, Arroyo H Jr, Veloz W, et al. Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries: ongoing dilemma-which cavity and when?. World J Surg. May 2002;26(5):539-43. [Medline]. 25. Balci AE, Eren N, Eren S, et al. Surgical treatment of post-traumatic tracheobronchial injuries: 14-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Dec 2002;22(6):984-9. [Medline]. 26. Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. Oct 27 1994;331(17):1105-9. 27. Boyd AD, Glassman LR. Trauma to the lung. Chest Surg Clin N Am. May 1997;7(2):263-84. [Medline]. 28. Campbell DB. Trauma to the chest wall, lung, and major airways. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jul 1992;4(3):234-40. [Medline].
29. Cothren C, Moore EE, Biffl WL, et al. Lung-sparing techniques are associated with improved outcome compared with anatomic resection for severe lung injuries. J Trauma. Sep 2002;53(3):483-7. 30. Czermak BV, Waldenberger P, Perkmann R, et al. Placement of endovascular stent-grafts for emergency treatment of acute disease of the descending thoracic aorta. AJR Am J Roentgenol 31. Demetriades D, Velmahos GC. Penetrating injuries of the chest: indications for operation. Scand J Surg. 2002;91(1):41-5. [Medline]. 32. Deneuville M. Morbidity of percutaneous tube thoracostomy in trauma patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Nov 2002;22(5):673-8. [Medline]. 33. Durham LA 3rd, Richardson RJ, Wall MJ Jr, et al. Emergency center thoracotomy: impact of prehospital resuscitation. J Trauma. Jun 1992;32(6):775-9. [Medline].
34. Frame SB, Thompson TC. Blunt Cardiac Injuries. In: Maull KI, Cleveland HC, Feliciano DV, Rice CL, Trunkey DD, Wolferth CC Jr, eds. Advances in Trauma and Critical Care. Vol. 10. St. Louis, M 42. 35. Freedland M, Wilson RF, Bender JS, et al. The management of flail chest injury: factors affecting outcome. J Trauma. Dec 1990;30(12):1460-8. [Medline]. 36. Freeman RK, Al-Dossari G, Hutcheson KA, et al. Indications for using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to diagnose diaphragmatic injuries after penetrating chest trauma. Ann Thorac Surg 37. Gasparri M, Karmy-Jones R, Kralovich KA, et al. Pulmonary tractotomy versus lung resection: viable options in penetrating lung injury. J Trauma. Dec 2001;51(6):1092-5; discussion 1096-7. 38. Huh J, Milliken JC, Chen JC. Management of tracheobronchial injuries following blunt and penetrating trauma. Am Surg. Oct 1997;63(10):896-9. [Medline]. 39. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, et al. Timing of urgent thoracotomy for hemorrhage after trauma: a multicenter study. Arch Surg. May 2001;136(5):513-8. [Medline]. 40. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Shatz DV, et al. Management of traumatic lung injury: a Western Trauma Association Multicenter review. J Trauma. Dec 2001;51(6):1049-53. [Medline]. 41. Karmy-Jones RC, Wagner JW, Lewis JW Jr. Esophageal injury. In: Trunkey DD, Lewis FR Jr, eds. Current Therapy of Trauma. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mo: Mosby; 1999:209-16. 42. Mancini MC, Eggerstedt JM. Hemothorax. eMedicine Journal [serial online]. 2006;[Full Text]. 43. Mandal AK, Sanusi M. Penetrating chest wounds: 24 years experience. World J Surg. Sep 2001;25(9):1145-9. [Medline].
44. Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Burch J, et al. Five thousand seven hundred sixty cardiovascular injuries in 4459 patients. Epidemiologic evolution 1958 to 1987. Ann Surg. Jun 1989;209(6):698-705; dis
45. Mattox KL, Johnston RH Jr, Wall MR Jr. Penetrating trauma. In: Pearson FG, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Hiebert CA, McKneally MF, Urschel HC Jr, eds. Thoracic Surgery. New York, NY: Churc 46. Melanson SW, Heller M. The emerging role of bedside ultrasonography in trauma care. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Feb 1998;16(1):165-89. [Medline]. 47. Mitchell RS. Endovascular stent graft repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Jul 1997;9(3):257-68. [Medline]. 48. Pate JW, Cole FH Jr, Walker WA, et al. Penetrating injuries of the aortic arch and its branches. Ann Thorac Surg. Mar 1993;55(3):586-92. [Medline]. 49. Patselas TN, Gallagher EG. The diagnostic dilemma of diaphragm injury. Am Surg. Jul 2002;68(7):633-9. [Medline]. 50. Pons F, Lang-Lazdunski L, de Kerangal X, et al. The role of videothoracoscopy in management of precordial thoracic penetrating injuries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. Jul 2002;22(1):7-12. [Medline]
51. Reynolds MA, Richardson JD. Chest wall and diaphragmatic injuries. In: Maull KI, Rodriguez A, Wiles CE III, eds. Complications in Trauma and Critical Care. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 199
emedicine.medscape.com/article/425698-overview
4/5
01/11/12
Penetrating Chest Trauma
52. Richardson J, Carrillo E. Thoracic infection after trauma. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1997;7(2):401-427. [Medline]. 53. Richardson JD, Flint LM, Snow NJ, et al. Management of transmediastinal gunshot wounds. Surgery. Oct 1981;90(4):671-6. [Medline]. 54. Robison P, Herman PK, Trinkle JK, Grover FL. Management of penetrating lung injuries in civilian practice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;95(2):184-190. 55. Stassen NA, Lukan JK, Spain DA, et al. Reevaluation of diagnostic procedures for transmediastinal gunshot wounds. J Trauma. Oct 2002;53(4):635-8; discussion 638. [Medline]. 56. Thomas MO, Ogunleye EO. Penetrating chest trauma in Nigeria. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. Jun 2005;13(2):103-6. 57. Wagner JW, Obeid FN, Karmy-Jones RC, et al. Trauma pneumonectomy revisited: the role of simultaneously stapled pneumonectomy. J Trauma. Apr 1996;40(4):590-4. [Medline]. 58. Wall MJ Jr, Storey JH, Mattox KL. Indications for thoracotomy. In: Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, eds. Trauma. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000:473-82. 59. Zakharia AT. Thoracic battle injuries in the Lebanon War: review of the early operative approach in 1,992 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. Sep 1985;40(3):209-13. [Medline]. Medscape Reference © 2011 WebMD, LLC
emedicine.medscape.com/article/425698-overview
5/5
View more...
Comments